Formula 1

Villeneuve: Raikkonen’s penalty would have been less if he’d hit Bottas – F1


Jacques Villeneuve believes Kimi Raikkonen received a more severe penalty in the British Grand Prix because he collided with Lewis Hamilton on home soil.

Raikkonen received a 10-second penalty at Silverstone after tapping Hamilton into a spin at the start, while Ferrari team-mate Sebastian Vettel was given a five-second punishment for colliding with Valtteri Bottas at the start of the French GP.

Villeneuve believes Raikkonen’s penalty highlights the inconsistency of officials in Formula 1, and he thinks the Finn would have received a smaller penalty if he’d hit his countryman in the second Mercedes.

“I don’t understand why it’s 10 seconds, and another time it’s five, sometimes it’s nothing,” Villeneuve told Autosport.

“That’s what’s wrong. It’s racing. I don’t like it when there are racing penalties, it should be for dirty driving, which is a different thing, or stupid driving.

“They decided that it’s Lewis, we’re in the UK, he’s fighting for the championship, that’s worth 10 seconds.

“If it had been Bottas, it would have been five seconds, that’s the thing.”

Villeneuve also highlighted Raikkonen’s clash with Max Verstappen at the Austrian Grand Prix, where they made contact on the opening lap and the Red Bull got ahead but did not receive a penalty, as another recent example of inconsistency.

“Sometimes you see things like Verstappen in Austria, when he touched Kimi,” he added.

“Why wasn’t that a penalty? Just because Kimi didn’t go off? If Kimi had gone off, then it would have been a penalty?

“That’s what’s wrong, it’s the action that matters, not what happens after the action, ultimately.”

The 1997 world champion believes Hamilton’s off-set tyre strategy triggered by the collision helped him in the closing stages, when he had fresher tyres than team-mate Bottas.

“Without them crashing into each other he would have been running third the whole race, not having people moving out of the way to let him by, he would destroyed his tyres,” he said.

“That ended up working out, because he was the later one to pit, so he was the one who at the end had tyres that were still OK compared to Bottas.

“He finished second after a crappy start, so he should be happy with that, because he wasn’t going to win this race. Nothing to complain about.”



Source link

Articles You May Like

F1 form in 2018 giving Valtteri Bottas consolation in winless run – F1
Austria tyre ‘shock’ led to Renault F1’s British GP strategy – F1
R-Motorsport Aston Martin allowed to keep Silverstone Blancpain win – GT
Robert Kubica: ‘Mega’ F1 reputation masked ‘rookie’ reality of 2017 – F1
F1 Podcast: Should Bottas have pitted under British GP safety car? – F1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *